Permanent identification
Names, serial numbers, logos, QR codes and small-detail marks on suitable stainless, titanium, brass and aluminium parts.
Learn what a galvo fiber laser can do, how power percentages and speed work together, how to build a reliable test grid, and how 2.5D relief engraving is made.
Many open-beam fiber markers are high-hazard systems. Check the machine's class and manual; keep the enclosure and interlocks working, control direct and reflected beams, use only wavelength/OD-matched protection required by the risk assessment, and extract fumes suitable for the material. Never look into the beam or a shiny reflection; never bypass an interlock. See the UK HSE laser guidance.
Fiber markers are especially effective on many metals. The same artwork can look very different depending on whether you change the surface, remove a coating, or actually ablate material.
Names, serial numbers, logos, QR codes and small-detail marks on suitable stainless, titanium, brass and aluminium parts.
Controlled heat can change the oxide or surface structure. MOPA sources add pulse-width control that can help tune some colour effects.
Remove selected anodised, painted or coated layers when the material and coating are confirmed suitable and extraction is in place.
Repeated passes remove material; a grayscale height map can vary the pass count to create visible physical relief on a galvo system.
Not a universal cutter: desktop marking heads are designed for marking and engraving, not general sheet-metal cutting. A metal-marking fiber source is also not a drop-in replacement for a CO₂/diode laser on wood or acrylic.
Power and speed are only part of the recipe. Keep lens, focus, material finish, frequency, pulse width, line interval and hatch strategy in your notes.
For a rough comparison, energy per scan length rises when commanded power rises or speed falls. But frequency, pulse width, line spacing, focus, material and heat buildup can change the result dramatically.
relative line energy ≈ power ÷ speed
Use this only to compare two tests on the same machine/material with everything else held constant—not to predict depth or transfer settings between lasers.
The arithmetic below converts a rated wattage into a nominal percentage equivalent. It helps you compare power classes, but the controller's percentage is not a calibrated measurement of the beam.
A 50W machine at 50% does not automatically engrave the same as a 20W machine at 100%. Pulse energy, spot size, source type, field lens, firmware limits and material response differ. Treat watts as a class label; tune the process with a coupon.
These examples are tied to named machines, materials and lenses. Copy the test idea, not blindly the numbers; a different source may not support the same frequency or pulse width.
| Goal & machine | Published example | What to learn from it |
|---|---|---|
| Stainless steel · dark anneal OMTech Galvo, standard F160 lens | 20W: 70–85% · 200–300 mm/s 30W: 50–65% · 300–450 mm/s 50W: 35–45% · 500–700 mm/s Shared example: 40–50 kHz, 0.015–0.020 mm interval, 90° cross-hatch. | Those are the maker's model-specific values for a smooth, dark surface mark. Annealing is not deep removal. Re-test the exact steel grade and finish. OMTech source. |
| Stainless steel · deep engraving OMTech Galvo, standard F160 lens | 20W: 90–100% · 300–500 mm/s 30W: 90–100% · 600–800 mm/s 50W: 85–95% · 1,000–1,500 mm/s Shared example: 20–30 kHz, on-focus, 3 hatch angles, 5–30 passes. | A faster scan on a higher-power source is a model-specific example, not a watt-for-watt conversion rule. Measure the depth and inspect heat/slag between pass groups. OMTech source. |
| Stainless steel · white / frost mark OMTech Galvo, standard F160 lens | 20W: 35–45% · 800–1,000 mm/s 30W: 25–35% · 1,200–1,500 mm/s 50W: 15–25% · 2,000–2,500 mm/s Shared example: 50–60 kHz, 0.03–0.04 mm interval. | The goal is surface texture and contrast, not depth. The shared frequency and hatch notes are also maker-specific; test the same grade of stainless. OMTech source. |
| Aluminium · 3D relief ComMarker B4 20W, 110 mm lens | 70% power · 800 mm/s · 43 kHz · 0.025 mm interval. The vendor reports about 256 passes for roughly 3 mm on its example blank. | Depth may take hundreds of slices and hours. The number is specific to that machine, artwork, alloy and setup—not a promise for another 20W laser. ComMarker example. |
| Brass coin · 2.5D relief ComMarker B6 60W MOPA, 150 mm lens | Fast example: 95%, 2,000 mm/s, 100 kHz, 200 ns, 0.025 mm, 256 slices. Detailed example: 80%, 1,000 mm/s, 30 kHz, 200 ns, 0.04 mm, 400 slices. | Use a grayscale depth map and the correct 3D-slice mode. MOPA pulse width and cleanup settings are source-specific; do not scale these values to a different wattage. ComMarker coin walkthrough. |
| Titanium · colour mark ComMarker 60W MOPA | 50% · 750 mm/s · 250–400 kHz · 2–10 ns · 0.01–0.03 mm. | Colour marking depends on pulse control, alloy, finish and lighting. This is a named MOPA example—not a standard-fiber setting. ComMarker titanium guide. |
| Titanium · deep engraving ComMarker Titan 100W MOPA example | Engrave: 75% · 200 mm/s · 100 kHz · 0.03 mm. Clean: 40% · 500 mm/s · 100 kHz · 0.03 mm. | Manufacturer example for titanium. It does not specify every source parameter; verify pulse, focus, shielding and material grade in the actual machine/manual. ComMarker titanium guide. |
Great for identification and contrast work on compatible metals. Deep removal can be slow and may need many passes.
More headroom for heavier ablation or 2.5D work, but material, lens, pulse source and heat management still control the result.
Can shorten some jobs and support demanding work. Higher power increases the need for engineered guarding, risk controls and a qualified process.
A small coupon tells you more than a copied preset. This planner creates a labelled numerical matrix you can reproduce in LightBurn or your galvo software.
Planning aid only—not an engraving simulation. The default range is deliberately moderate; follow your manual and begin conservatively.
Columns increase in power → · rows increase in speed ↑ · keep frequency, pulse width, focus, interval and passes fixed for this first comparison.
Record exact alloy/coating, source wattage and type, lens/field size, focus method and finish. Clean it the same way each time. Keep the piece flat and secure.
Run a power-by-speed matrix. Keep frequency, pulse width (if available), line interval, hatch angle, focus and pass count constant. Use a range your manufacturer allows.
Inspect under the lighting you will use in real life. For depth, feel and measure the result; for contrast, compare colour and legibility. Don't choose by appearance alone if the part has a functional requirement.
Repeat a smaller grid around the winner. Next test interval or frequency—one axis at a time. Save a named recipe with material, source, lens, software, date and finish.
LightBurn's Material Test tool can vary Power, Speed, Interval or Passes; Frequency and Q-Pulse are testable when the device supports them. It labels the axes so you can compare results. Read LightBurn's Material Test guide.
Multiple passes can remove material, but depth per pass changes as the pocket deepens, debris accumulates and focus shifts. Measure a test coupon; don't infer millimetres from power percent.
For a workpiece that needs a specified tolerance, validate with a suitable measuring tool and material test—not the on-screen pass count.
This simple proportional estimate uses your own test result. It is not a depth model; removal is rarely linear.
A 3D relief image is not simply a photograph. It is a height map: each grey value represents a height/depth, and the software maps those tones to a different number of passes.
LightBurn describes this as 2.5D: it can make physical relief without a live Z axis, but does not provide precise depth control.
LightBurn's guide says darker height-map areas receive more passes by default; 3D Sliced mode is for Galvo lasers, and the exact depth is not precisely controlled. LightBurn 2.1 supports 16-bit depth maps, which can be useful when using more than 256 slices. Open the official 3D Sliced guide.
No. A wattage label alone doesn't define the source type, pulse behavior, lens, focus, material alloy or finish. Use a cited recipe only as a test starting point for the exact machine/material combination it describes.
It is the controller's maximum command, not a calibrated reading. The simple watt calculator on this page is arithmetic only. Check your source manual and calibrate the process with a coupon.
Most desktop galvo markers are for marking and engraving. Some can remove or cut very thin material with special fixtures and many passes, but that is not ordinary sheet-metal cutting; follow the manufacturer's limits and risk controls.
Only if the exact material and laser source are approved for that process. Some plastics can create hazardous fumes. Never process PVC/vinyl or unknown coatings; identify the material and use suitable extraction.
Measure a test coupon after cleaning it. Depth per pass changes as the pocket deepens, and a relief's greyscale values usually control pass count rather than a guaranteed millimetre depth.
Check the software and controller: mm/s and mm/min differ by a factor of 60. Verify the unit before running a recipe; a unit mismatch can change exposure dramatically.
These sources provide the method and the named-machine examples above. Always check the latest manual for your own source.
Educational reference only, not a substitute for the laser maker's manual, material safety data, a risk assessment or competent safety advice. Parameter examples are model-specific and may change as manufacturers update documentation.